
Flashback.
Back in September i wrote
this post on David Mamet's 1991 masterpiece
Homicide. The post was partly about the idea of conspiracy and how it links to the film.
Since then a lot has happened.
I ordered one of the last three copies of the script available on the internet (and the last copy on British soil). The script was lost / stolen? in the mail. I was refunded but it meant I had to order it from the US, double the price.
Still, as i'm sure you've figured out by now i'm kinda stubborn, so i did pay over £25 to get the script from the US. The retailers asked me to email them when i receive it because it was "rare" (!).
Anyway, eventually the script arrived but that wasn't the end of my trouble.
Amazingly, one of the key essays written on the film, William Van Wert's excellent essay entitled "Conspiracy Theory in Mamet's Homicide", which was originally available
here,
disappeared from the internet! In the 11 years of my online existence, I've seen many sites go out etc but we always manage to find stuff via search engines etc. Van Wert's essay disappeared from the face of cyberspace -
along with several mentions to it. That is to say, websites that appeared to cite/link to the essay (on Google) had taken out their links. And all that happened like within the last three months or so. I was wise enough to print out a copy - a single copy, which i now keep locked in a secret location, a safe house, in Vancouver.
Anyway, all that was as a means to an introduction for what i'm about to report.
Last Monday i organised a 4-hour workshop on Mamet's Homicide with my 2nd-year communication and media students. The workshop started with a screening of the film. The four seminar groups were then assigned specific briefs looking at:
a) dialogue
b) narrative / plot
c) symbols and visual signs
d) identity and conspiracy.
They convened separately and came up with some brilliant ideas, which they presented at the last hour of the workshop.
It would be impossible to summarise the entire workshop in one blog post. We literally took the entire film and script apart, and put it back together. I'm sure not even Mamet himself is aware of things that we found in his film.

If you've seen the film and are interested in finding it out more let me know, i can forward you the briefing pack and the powerpoint presentation that we produced.
In the meantime, here is a small sample.
**Attention: Spoiler Alert!**There are
TEN coincidences driving the plot - and Bobby Gold in his journey of self discovery. In other words things that appear really key and pre-planned in the mystery / conspiracy / story are actually based on wafer-thin coincidences. Is Mamet taking the piss out of his own hero (by implying that conspiracies are in our own heads)? And is he implying that seeking our identity is a futile or even dangerous activity?
1. Driving by the murder – being picked up by the Jews / Chief to investigate
2. Found the photo because of the housekeeper leaving the frame off centre
3. Being in the Jew family’s house when there was disturbance
4. Finding the piece of paper (GROFAZ) on the floor of the terrace [next to the pigeons, we now know it was torn off a feed sack]
5. In the old lady’s store, he breaks the stepladder then stumbles upon the crate with her lists and invoices from the war
6. In the library, the rabbi asks him to place the book on the shelf (and he accepts) and then he overhears the librarians, otherwise he would have never had heard of 212, which is where they were expecting him?!
7. He then chooses to look at the librarian’s leftover clipboard (coincidently put there?)
8. He chooses to go to 212 Humboldt St.
9. After being kicked out of 212 he doesn’t leave – he ‘accidentally’ meets the woman
10. The woman is reluctant to give him the bomb – what if he hadn’t volunteered? They wouldn’t have got the polaroids to frame him
Cascardi (quoted in Calhoun) argues that “The modern subject is defined by its insertion into a series of separate value-spheres, each one of which tends to exclude or attempts to assert its priority over the rest”.
Nagel 1998: 239 notes that “Ethnic identity is most closely associated with the issue of boundaries. Ethnic boundaries determine who is a member and who is not and designate which ethnic categories are available for individual identification at a particular time and place. Debates over the placement of ethnic boundaries and the social worth of ethnic groups are central mechanisms in ethnic construction. Ethnicity is created and recreated as various groups put forth competing visions of the ethnic composition of society and argue over which rewards or sanctions should be attached to which ethnicities.”
It is this sort of questions that Mamet is asking:
- are identities ‘natural’? [essentialist view – cf. racism, chauvinism]
- do we construct our own identities? (how?)
- do others construct our identities? (how?)
- does ‘society’ construct our identities? (and what is society?)
His hero, Bobby Gold, is facing a struggle between his identity as a police officer serving the United States of America (with all the ethnic and religious issues that that brings) and being a Jew. Or is he? What makes a Jew? Is it language? He can't read. Is it religion? He's not practicing. Or as the members of the Jewish cabal tell him:
“You say you’re a Jew and you can’t read Hebrew. What are you then?”
“Where are your loyalties? You want the glory, you want the home, you are willing to do nothing”
“Do you have a shame? You belong nowhere...”
“Do you call that loyalty?”
“Are you a Jew? Then be a Jew!”
Family, as a key venue of post-ethnic identity and belonging, is also a core theme in
Homicide. While scholars have hinted that Mamet is supporting family as an alternative socialisation paradigm, every notion of family is assaulted in
Homicide:
- the guy who killed his wife and 3 kids 'to protect them'
- Randolph's mother betrayed her son 'to protect him'
- Bobby failed to protect Tim (his real family)
- Bobby failed to integrate within the Jewish cabal (his natural family).
Tribal identity, cabals, ethnicity and race, religion, even gender and sexuality, loyalty, belonging, nationalism, us and the Other, are the key themes of
Homicide. Quoting my September 2005 self, "Homicide is like these oil-on-canvas paintings by the old masters which hide several layers of paint and drawings." You have to dig really deep, and you'll be compensated with more and more hidden clues, symbols, signs, messages and meanings.